Subtitle: Why young college minds are the key to redefining public safety through smart technology, policy innovation, and social justice.
⸻
Introduction: What is GoVia?
GoVia is a revolutionary community policing and safety app designed to foster transparency, trust, and dialogue between civilians, law enforcement, legal advocates, and mental health professionals. It empowers users to record incidents, initiate live video chats with legal or mental health responders, and engage with policy updates in real time.
In an era of increasing scrutiny around public safety and police-citizen interactions, GoVia offers a real-time, decentralized response network for both protection and reform. Its mission? To protect civil rights, prevent unnecessary escalations, and support community-centered safety.
⸻
Why Students Are Vital to GoVia’s Mission
Young people—particularly college and graduate students—are not only digital natives, but many are also deeply engaged in social justice, policy reform, tech innovation, and mental health advocacy. They can help shape GoVia’s infrastructure while gaining real-world experience and making measurable social impact.
⸻
Student Involvement Across Key Domains
Here are core areas where students can actively contribute:
1. Policy & Legal Reform
• Law students can assist in reviewing statutes and propose state-specific guidelines for lawful citizen-police encounters.
• Contribute to real-time documentation on qualified immunity, Terry v. Ohio (392 U.S. 1), and community rights to record police (e.g., Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78).
2. Mental Health Integration
• Psychology and psychiatry students can build protocols for dispatching mental health professionals during non-violent crisis calls.
• Collaborate with social workers to develop non-carceral intervention models, such as the CAHOOTS model in Eugene, Oregon.
3. Tech & AI Development
• Computer science majors can improve facial recognition fairness, geolocation accuracy, and app encryption.
• Work on AI-based threat detection models with ethical safeguards to prevent profiling or misuse.
4. Social Justice Education
• Sociology and political science students can research systemic disparities and help train AI models to avoid bias.
• Help create educational content on community rights, anti-racism, and historical policing disparities.
⸻
Step 1: Divergent Thinking – 3 Innovative Solutions
Problem: How can GoVia engage young college students to scale the app while driving meaningful public safety reform?
Solution A: Campus Innovation Labs (CIL)
Create GoVia-funded interdisciplinary research hubs on campuses that develop safety tech, model legal frameworks, and test policy simulations.
Solution B: Community Advocate Fellowship
Establish a fellowship program where students work with local police departments and mental health orgs to implement and field-test GoVia tools.
Solution C: “Safety Corps” Peer Network
Launch a peer-led network of trained student ambassadors who teach digital self-defense, civil rights, and GoVia tools on campus and in local neighborhoods.
⸻
Step 2: Analysis
Solution A: Campus Innovation Labs
1. Strengths:
• Institutional support and credibility
• Encourages cross-departmental collaboration
• Long-term research potential (e.g., criminal justice reform and AI ethics)
2. Weaknesses:
• Time to build infrastructure
• Requires deep faculty buy-in
3. Effort & Resources:
• High (grants, tech setup, ongoing mentorship)
• Needs sustained partnerships with universities
4. Roadblocks:
• University bureaucracy
• Institutional resistance to law enforcement topics
5. Potential Scenarios:
• Labs produce student-led policy briefs that influence state or federal policing laws
6. Success Probability:
• 75%, given proper funding and strategic academic partnerships
⸻
Solution B: Community Advocate Fellowship
1. Strengths:
• Hands-on, real-world impact
• Direct connection to public service
2. Weaknesses:
• Could face political backlash from conservative municipalities
• Risk of burnout among students
3. Effort & Resources:
• Moderate to high (stipends, legal oversight, training modules)
4. Roadblocks:
• Liability concerns if involved in active policing contexts
5. Potential Scenarios:
• A fellow helps rewrite local department policy based on GoVia community data
6. Success Probability:
• 65%, depending on political climate and city cooperation
⸻
Solution C: “Safety Corps” Peer Network
1. Strengths:
• Scalable grassroots model
• Empowers student agency and peer education
2. Weaknesses:
• Requires ongoing recruitment and training
• Risk of inconsistent quality in delivery
3. Effort & Resources:
• Low to moderate (mostly outreach and training materials)
4. Roadblocks:
• Oversight challenges
• Varying student engagement levels
5. Potential Scenarios:
• Safety Corps partners with local high schools to deliver digital safety education
6. Success Probability:
• 80%, especially in urban or progressive campuses
⸻
Step 3: Selection and Ranking
1. Most Promising: Solution C – Safety Corps
• Justification: Highest scalability and lowest resource barrier. The peer-led model builds trust and avoids red tape. It’s aligned with how younger demographics already mobilize.
2. Runner-up: Solution A – Campus Innovation Labs
• High impact if institutions support it. Could birth real-world legislation or ethics-focused AI tools. Slower and more resource-heavy, but great long-term ROI.
3. Third Place: Solution B – Community Advocate Fellowship
• Strong real-world exposure, but highest risk due to potential legal and political friction. Ideal as a next step after building student networks and institutional credibility.
⸻
GoVia’s Take: Building a Safer Society Together
GoVia isn’t just another app—it’s an entry point into systemic reform powered by data, dialogue, and digital tools. By embedding this mission within the most curious and committed minds—young college and graduate students—we open the door to transformative community safety models.
Join GoVia today to help shape safer, smarter communities—because real change starts with courageous ideas and collaborative action.
⸻
Fact-Based References
• Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011): Citizens have a First Amendment right to record public officials.
• Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968): Stop-and-frisk requires reasonable suspicion, not probable cause.
• National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI): Studies support co-responder models over police-only interventions.
• The CAHOOTS model (Eugene, OR): 20% of 911 calls diverted from police to mental health professionals.
• Pew Research (2023): 73% of Gen Z believes technology can play a role in reducing police misconduct.
@CWRU, @OhioStateUniversity, @UniversityofCincinnati, @BerkeleyUCalifornia, @ClevelandStateUniversity, @KentStateUniversity, CWRU, Ohio State, University of Cincinnati, Berkeley
California, Cleveland State University, Kent State University
Tanzania, Hong Kong, India, China and United Kingdom and the States
